![]() We don't need the play-by-play narrative on this as much as we do the general narrative, what the important developments are, how you're thinking, and so forth. I think it would be useful to tackle those one at a time, as interesting subjects for which to get two different frames of reference. Then, the thing that we really didn't get to very much last time was the key geographic areas, the issue areas. I have some questions, and Seyom does too, about the transitional area, some questions about President Bush and his own development as President, any changes in his ways of thinking or doing business that you may have witnessed from 2001 to 2005. ![]() ![]() We talked a little bit about this in the first interview, but not so much related to the White House and where the National Security Advisor role fits into this. The only people who are allowed to report what goes on in the discussion are the two of you.Īlthough we're going to focus mostly on the second term, according to our prior arrangement, I wanted to begin by asking some questions about the transition from the first to the second term. We've had a brief conversation before the tape began about the ground rules, but again the fundamental one is that this is completely confidential. Thanks very much for inviting us to Stanford for this occasion. This is the joint interview with Condoleezza Rice and Stephen Hadley as a part of the George Bush 43 Oral History Project.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |